FUNCTIONAL ANALYSIS: Difference between revisions
From MDWiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
mNo edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
[[Literature supporting conclusion]] | [[Literature supporting conclusion]] | ||
During the ProFunc analysis [http://www.ebi.ac.uk/thornton-srv/databases/cgi-bin/profunc/runprog.pl?prog=funchtml&html_name=seq001_aln.html&pdbcode=ay99&user_id=&pdb_type=PROFUNC&code=053949 UniProt] was used to perform a multiple sequence alignment on our protein sequence. The top 2 results were both highly conserved as well as also being YlqF proteins. The rest of the 10 proteins listed were all either GTPase or GTP binding proteins. This sequence search supports the literature in its claim that the YlqF protein is required for the late step of 50s ribosomal subunit assembly. | |||
Revision as of 12:13, 10 June 2007
50S ribosome assembly in Bacillus subtilis
Literature supporting conclusion
During the ProFunc analysis UniProt was used to perform a multiple sequence alignment on our protein sequence. The top 2 results were both highly conserved as well as also being YlqF proteins. The rest of the 10 proteins listed were all either GTPase or GTP binding proteins. This sequence search supports the literature in its claim that the YlqF protein is required for the late step of 50s ribosomal subunit assembly.