Mz: Difference between revisions

From MDWiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
'''Why Evolution?'''
'''Why Evolution?'''


Gene VS Environment Interaction
- Divergence / Convergence
- Divergence / Convergence
- Homology: Orthology / Paralog  -- common ancestral genes)
- Homology: Orthology / Paralog  -- common ancestral genes)
- Gene Duplication / Transfer
- Gene Duplication / Transfer
- Natural Selection
- Natural Selection



Revision as of 01:10, 10 June 2008

Why Evolution?


Gene VS Environment Interaction - Divergence / Convergence

- Homology: Orthology / Paralog -- common ancestral genes)

- Gene Duplication / Transfer

- Natural Selection

 By studying protein evolutions, 
  1. The behavior of the genes / environment (Knowledge)
  2. Artifical selection (Application)



1. Psi-BLAST search and sequences selection:

  • Selected organisms (33) across the three domains include:

Archae (6) - A3 (Methanococcus voltae A3), 6A8 (Candidatus Methanoregula boonei 6A8), C.symbiosum (Cenarchaeum symbiosum A), GSS1 (Thermoplasma volcanium GSS1), A. fulgidus (Archaeoglobus fulgidus DSM 4304), uncultured (uncultured methanogenic archaeon RC-I)

Bacteria (7) - Goettinger (Syntrophomonas wolfei subsp. wolfei str. Goettingen), Lettingae (Thermotoga lettingae), ATCC 824 (Clostridium acetobutylicum ATCC 824), MIT 9211 (Prochlorococcus marinus str. MIT 9211), BAV1 (Dehalococcoides sp. BAV1), DSM 4136 (Verrucomicrobium spinosum DSM 4136), DSM 245 (Chlorobium limicola DSM 245)

Eukaryota (20)- Red Rice Japanese / Indian (Oryza sativa), Neurospora (Neurospora crassa OR74A), C.reinhardtii (Chlamydomonas reinhardtii), C.Elegans (Caenorhabditis elegans), Thale cress (Arabidopsis thaliana), Fission yeast (Schizosaccharomyces pombe 972h-), Brewer’s yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae), Zebrafish (Danio rerio), Drosophila.pseudo (Drosophila pseudoobscura), Fruit Fly (Drosophila melanogaster), western clawed frog (Xenopus tropicalis), African clawed frog (Xenopus laevis), Chicken (gallus gallus), Mouse (mus mucus), Rat (Rattus norvegicus), Cow (Bos taurus), Chimpanzee (Pan troglodytes), Human (homo sapiens).


2. ClustalX - multiple sequence alignment and conserved motifs:

Figure 1: P-loop folding relies on at least two motifs, S-G-K-G(2)-V-G-K-[ST] and D-X-D-[VFLIM]-X-G. Motif 1 and 2.jpg


Figure 2: Another two conserved alpha and beta NUBP/MRP, which are likely to associate with the folding of p-loop components. Motif 3 and 4.jpg



3. Phylogenic Trees and evolution:

Figure 3: Nucleotide binding protein 1 (long form) might appear earlier than nucleotide binding protein 2 (short form) during evolution. Subgroup.jpg




4. Prokaryotic MRP proteins might be the paralogs to Human NUBP (1, 2).

  (1) Functional differences:
  prokaryotic MRP: Na+/H+ antiporter
  eukaryotic NUBP: regulate  the cycle of centrosome replication in concert with NUBP1 and KIFC5A (MinCD complex)
  (2) Structural similarity:
      Most human NUBP2 psi-BLAST results (proteins) possess MRP-like regions
  (3) How MRP evolved into functionally distinct NUBP remain unclear. 

5. Evolution conlusions: In conclusion, prokaryotic MRP proteins and eukaryotic nucleotide binding proteins (NBP) are paralogs that share a common ancestral gene but possess different functions. Many NBPs contain the highly conserved structure P-loop (MRP-like) that acts as an ATPase. There are two subtypes of NBP in eukarytes, NBP1 appeared earlier in evolution than NBP2. The origination of NBP2 was likely achieved by the deletion of the Cysteine-rich N-terminal of NBP1.

      Gene duplication? 
      SNP and structure/functional analysis