Structure of 2ob5: Difference between revisions

From MDWiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
mNo edit summary
(interspersed images)
Line 1: Line 1:
[[hypothetical protein LOC282969 isoform 1 |  Go Back To Main Page]]
[[hypothetical protein LOC282969 isoform 1 |  Go Back To Main Page]]


[[Image:1ogd_cl_cage.jpg|left|thumbnail|Structural ]]
[[Image:1ogd_key-lig.jpg|right|thumbnail|Structural ]]
[[Image:2ob5-1ogd_cl_mesh.jpg|left|thumbnail|Structural ]]
[[Image:2ob5_cl_cage.jpg|right|thumbnail|Structural ]]
[[Image:2ob5_cl_mesh.jpg|left|thumbnail|Structural ]]
[[Image:2ob5_key-lig.jpg|right|thumbnail|Structural ]]
[[Image:2ob5_triple_align.jpg|left|thumbnail|Structural ]]
[[Image:2ob5_triple-set.jpg|right|thumbnail|Structural ]]
[[Image:3e7n_complex_surf.jpg|left|thumbnail|Structural ]]
[[Image:CASTp_2ob5_cl.jpg|right|thumbnail|Structural ]]
[[Image:CASTp_2ob5_lig.jpg|left|thumbnail|Structural ]]
[[Image:1ogD_lig_surf.jpg|right|thumbnail|Structural ]]
[[Image:2ob5_lig_surf.jpg|left|thumbnail|Structural ]]
[[Image:2ob5_sec_struct.gif|right|thumbnail|Structural ]]
[[Image:1ogd_ligplot.gif|left|thumbnail|Structural ]]
[[Image:1ogd_clplot.gif|right|thumbnail|Structural ]]


[[Image:2ob5_main.jpg|Structure of 2ob5]]


Initial structural analyses indicate that 2ob5A is a member of the RbsD/FucU protein superfamily, and is of the RbsD-like fold classification. It is a globular protein composed of five alpha-helixes  arranged around six internal beta strands in the tri-layered a/b/a fold characteristic of RbsD-like proteins.  
Initial structural analyses indicate that 2ob5A is a member of the RbsD/FucU protein superfamily, and is of the RbsD-like fold classification. It is a globular protein composed of five alpha-helixes  arranged around six internal beta strands in the tri-layered a/b/a fold characteristic of RbsD-like proteins.  


[[Image:2ob5_main.jpg|Structure of 2ob5]]
[[Image:2ob5_sec_struct.gif|right|thumbnail|Structural ]]


Early structural alignments suppoorted this classification, returning ribose-transport proteins as high similarity hits. Of the structures found, the majority of high-significance (z > 15) matches were variations on two prokaryotic RbsD proteins, 3e7n (D-ribose high affinity transport system, S. Typhi) and 1ogD (high affinity ribose transporting protein, B. Subtillis).  
Early structural alignments (such as Dali) suppoorted this classification, returning ribose-transport proteins as high similarity hits. Of the structures found, the majority of high-significance (z > 15) matches were variations on two prokaryotic RbsD proteins, 3e7n (D-ribose high affinity transport system, S. Typhi) and 1ogD (high affinity ribose transporting protein, B. Subtillis). These two crystal structures are shown at right.  


[[Image:1ogd_3e7n_main.jpg|left|thumbnail|Structures of 1ogd (A) and 3e7n (B)]]
[[Image:1ogd_3e7n_main.jpg|left|thumbnail|Structures of 1ogd (A) and 3e7n (B)]]


Crystallographic visualisation of these two proteins has revealed that the biological unit of each is a homo-decameric oligomer, which has a ring--like quaternary structure. (Figures) The complete oligomer of 3e7n is shown below. PQS analysis of both structures suggests that this decameric assembly is correct for each.
Crystallographic visualisation of these two proteins has revealed that the biological unit of each is a homo-decameric oligomer, which has a ring--like quaternary structure. The complete oligomer of 3e7n is shown at left. PQS analysis of both structures suggests that this decameric assembly is correct for each.


[[Image:3e7n_complex_surf.jpg|right|thumbnail|Quaternary structure of 3e7n with ligands]]
[[Image:3e7n_complex_surf.jpg||Structural ]]


Note the ring-like structure of the oligomer, which contains distinct upper and lower pentameric sub-rings which are rotated slightly relative to each other, such that no more than three subunits coincide at any one junction.  
Note the ring-like structure of the oligomer, which contains distinct upper and lower pentameric sub-rings which are rotated slightly relative to each other, such that no more than three subunits coincide at any one junction.  
Line 36: Line 21:




Structural similarity between the monomers of both proteins and 2ob5A is high, despite sequence identity values of less than 20%. To confirm the high structural identity of the alignment results (z=17.9 and 16.9 for 3e7n-c and 1ogd-D, respectively), the proteins were aligned using MultiSeq for VMD and overlaid. From visual analysis (Figure) the strength of the alignment is clear.  
Structural similarity between the monomers of both proteins and 2ob5A is high, despite sequence identity values of less than 20%. To confirm the high structural identity of the Dali results (z=17.9 and 16.9 for 3e7n-c and 1ogd-D, respectively), the proteins were aligned using MultiSeq for VMD and overlaid. [[Image:2ob5_triple_align.jpg|left|thumbnail|Structural alignment of 2ob5 (red/blue), 1ogd (green) and 3e7n (yellow-green)]] From visual analysis the strength of the alignment is clear.  


[[Image:2ob5-1ogd-3e7n_align1.jpg|left|thumbnail|Structural alignment of 2ob5 (red/blue), 1ogd (green) and 3e7n (yellow-green)]]
At left, 2ob5 is coloured by a BLOSUM60 plot of residue conservation. The prevalence of blue residues in the internal beta-sheets indicates high sequence conservation in those regions. This is supported by the molecule's RbsD-like fold classification, as the 6-strand beta-sheet structure is highly conserved in RbsD proteins.  
 
2ob5 is coloured by a BLOSUM60 plot of residue conservation. The prevalence of blue residues in the internal beta-sheets indicates high sequence conservation in those regions. This is supported by the molecule's RbsD-like fold classification, as the 6-strand beta-sheet structure is highly conserved in RbsD proteins.  




Line 47: Line 30:
Due to this considerable structural similarity, we conducted an in depth comparison of 2ob5A to the better characterised 3e7n and 1ogd.  
Due to this considerable structural similarity, we conducted an in depth comparison of 2ob5A to the better characterised 3e7n and 1ogd.  


The binding sites of 1ogd are known, and the protein has been crystallised bound to its ribose-D ligand in a pentameric ring quaternary structure. The oligomerisation of the protein appears necessary for the binding of this ligand, as the active site lies in a cleft between proteins adjacent on the same ring (Fig. surf binding), and includes coordinating residues from both subunits.
The binding sites of 1ogd are known, and the protein has been crystallised bound to its ribose-D ligand in a pentameric ring quaternary structure. The oligomerisation of the protein appears necessary for the binding of this ligand, as the active site lies in a cleft between proteins adjacent on the same ring [[Image:1ogD_lig_surf.jpg|right|thumbnail|Structural ]], and includes coordinating residues from both subunits.
 
A LIGPLOT analysis of the 1ogd ribose-D binding site is shown below. His20 is donated by the adjacent monomer, shown in 3D in figure X. Residues are again coloured by sequence conservation. All five residues are conserved in 3e7n, further supporting their involvement in binding of ribose-D.  


2ob5A was not crystallised with ligand present; as such, it is uncertain whether it too is a ribose binding protein. His20, Tyr120 and Asp28 on 1ogd are all conserved in 2ob5A. Asn122 appears to have undergone a deletion judging from the sequence alignment, and His98 and Lys102 have been substituted for by Arg and Tyr residues, respectively. These differences may suggest a slightly different specificity. However, the 3D Multiseq alignment of 2ob5 with 1ogD and 3e7n retained the binding amino acids in position. Superimposition of the 1ogD ligand onto an aligned 2ob5A suggests that the binding mode and/or ligand of 2ob5 is similar.  (Fig X, key lig).  
A LIGPLOT analysis of the 1ogd ribose-D binding site is shown at left. [[Image:1ogd_ligplot.gif|left|thumbnail|Structural ]]
His20 is donated by the adjacent monomer. This residue arrangement is shown in 3D in at right. [[Image:1ogd_key-lig.jpg|right|thumbnail|Structural ]] Residues are again coloured by sequence conservation. All five residues are conserved in 3e7n, further supporting their involvement in binding of ribose-D.  


Visualisation of the corresponding surfaces indicate that a binding cleft is still present on 2ob5A (Fig X, key surf). In addition, CASTp analysis predicts the monomer's highest surface-area cleft at this site. A large pocket is also identified in 1ogd, although this protein's pentameric crystallisation allows its predicted cleft to include the adjacent His20 residue (Fig).
2ob5A was not crystallised with ligand present. As such, it is uncertain whether it too is a ribose binding protein. His20, Tyr120 and Asp28 on 1ogd are all conserved in 2ob5A. Asn122 appears to have undergone a deletion judging from the sequence alignment, and His98 and Lys102 have been substituted for by Arg and Tyr residues, respectively. These differences may suggest a slightly different specificity. However, the 3D Multiseq alignment of 2ob5 with 1ogD and 3e7n retained the binding amino acids in position. Superimposition of the 1ogD ligand onto an aligned 2ob5A suggests that the binding mode and/or ligand of 2ob5 is similar [[Image:2ob5_key-lig.jpg|right|thumbnail|Structural ]].  


Visualisation of the corresponding surfaces indicate that a binding cleft is still present on 2ob5A. [[Image:2ob5_lig_surf.jpg|left|thumbnail|Structural ]] In addition, CASTp analysis predicts the monomer's highest surface-area cleft at this site. [[Image:CASTp_2ob5_lig.jpg|left|thumbnail|Structural ]]
A large pocket is identified by CASTp in 1ogd atthe same site, although this protein's pentameric crystallisation allows its predicted cleft to include the adjacent His20 residue.


1ogd was also cocrystallised with an ion, tentatively labelled as a chloride in this case. The ion coordinating site lies at the amino-terminus of the protein. Ligplot analysis gives Lys2 as a key residue for ion coordination. Figure X (1ogD1_side) shows the 3D alignment of two 1ogD pentamers onto the 3e7n decameric scaffold. The chloride ion is visible in the centre of the facing side. Bound Ribose-D molecules are also visible.


From this, it is suggested that ions are by two adjacent monomers, through their Lys2 resides. Unlike the ribose binding site, however, the ion binding cleft is formed by subunits on different pentameric rings; one from the upper and one lower. The Lys2 residues combine with hydrophobic residues on each subunit's aminoi-terminal loop to form an ion cage structure. This is clearly visible in figure X (1ogd_key-highlight). Although the individual hydrophobic residues are poorly conserved, the cage structure and coordinating lysines are also present on 3e7n. It is possible that this ion contributes to the stability of the decameric ring, existing as it does at the interfaces between top and bottom halves of the oligomer.  
1ogd was cocrystallised with an ion, tentatively labelled as a chloride in this case. The ion coordinating site lies at the amino-terminus of the protein. Ligplot analysis gives Lys2 as a key residue for ion coordination. [[Image:1ogd_clplot.gif|left|thumbnail|Structural ]]
Figure X [[Image:1ogd_dec_rib|right|thumbnail|Structural ]] shows the 3D alignment of two 1ogD pentamers onto the 3e7n decameric scaffold. The chloride ion is visible in the centre of the facing side. Bound Ribose-D molecules are also visible.  


When four monomers of 2ob5 are superimposed on corresponding 1ogd or 3e7n subunits, the target protein is seen to retain the ion cage structure. However, the critical coordinating lysine is not present, and has been replaced with a hydrophobic leucine residue (Figure X, 2ob5 key-highlight). Leucine ios uncharged and cannot coordinate a Cl ion. The only nearby positive residue - an arginine, which replaces alanine on 1ogd - appears in the wrong orientation, although this may be an artifact of the alignment. It is possible that 2ob5A does not have the ability to coordinate an ion at this site.
From this, it is suggested that ions are coordinated by two adjacent monomers; specificlly by the residue Lys 2. Unlike the ribose binding site, however, the ion binding cleft is formed by subunits on different pentameric rings; one from the upper and one lower. The Lys2 residues combine with hydrophobic residues on each subunit's amini-terminal loop to form an ion cage structure. [[Image:1ogd_cl_cage.jpg|left|thumbnail|Structural ]]
This is clearly visible in the figure at left. Although the individual hydrophobic residues are poorly conserved, the cage structure and coordinating lysines are also present on 3e7n. It is possible that this ion contributes to the stability of the decameric ring, existing as it does at the interfaces between top and bottom halves of the oligomer.  


Surface representations of the 1ogD Cl-binding cleft indicate a buried coordination site (Fig X, surf-mesh1). This corresponds to the predicted ion cage structure. The interface between the two subunits covers a comparatively large surface area at this site, and the region as a whole is comparatively well conserved (Figure X surf-lic1). Of particular note is the residue Lys3, which is conserved across all three crystallised proteins and lies in an extended cleft in the adjacent monomer.  
When monomers of 2ob5 are superimposed on the ring structure of 1ogd or 3e7n, the target protein appears to retain its ion cage structure. [[Image:2ob5_cl_cage.jpg|right|thumbnail|Structural ]] However, the critical coordinating lysine is not present. Lys2 has been replaced with a hydrophobic leucine residue (figure at right), which cannot coordinate a Cl ion. The only nearby positive residue - an arginine, which replaces Ala16 on 1ogd - appears in the wrong orientation, although this may be an artifact of the alignment. It is possible that 2ob5A does not have the ability to coordinate an ion at this site.


This residue and its cleft is conserved in 2ob5, although individual sequence conservation at the cleft is not high. (Figure X, 2ob5-surf-lic2). This, along with a number of corresponding cleft-ligand-like features at the subunit interface of 2ob5, suggests that 2ob5 exists in the same decameric conformation as 1ogd and 3e7n despite the potential lack of ion coordination. (Figure X 2ob5_surf-mesh1). Cast-P analysis supports this, as the molecule's second-largest predicted binding surface lies around the putative ion-coordinating region (Fig).  
[[Image:1ogD_cl_mesh.jpg|left|thumbnail|Structural ]] Surface representations of the 1ogD Cl-binding cleft indicate a buried coordination site. This corresponds to the predicted ion cage structure. The interface between the two subunits covers a comparatively large surface area at this site, and the region as a whole is comparatively well conserved. Of particular note is the residue Lys3, which is conserved across all three crystallised proteins and lies in an extended cleft in the adjacent monomer.  


Capt: 2ob5 is shown here with the Cl ion present. As discussed above, this may not be the case in situ.
This residue and its cleft is conserved in 2ob5, although individual sequence conservation at the cleft is not high. [[Image:2ob5_cl_mesh.jpg|left|thumbnail|2ob5 is shown here with the Cl ion present. As discussed, this may not be the case in situ.]] This, along with a number of corresponding cleft-ligand-like features at the subunit interface of 2ob5, suggests that 2ob5 exists in the same decameric conformation as 1ogd and 3e7n despite the potential lack of ion coordination. Cast-P analysis supports this, as the molecule's second-largest predicted binding surface lies around the putative ion-coordinating region. [[Image:CASTp_2ob5_cl.jpg|right|thumbnail|Structural ]]


Finally, shown below are representations of a four-subunit face of each protein, demonstrating potential binding sites for D-ribose and Cl. Residues are coloured by sequence conservation between these three proteins. It is again clear that the structural alignment is good, even at the quaternary level. Additionally, it can be seen that although 2ob5 has many areas of low conservation, these generally correspond with variable loop regions, and that the key secondary-structural elements remain remarkably constant.
Finally, shown here are representations of a four-subunit face of each protein, demonstrating potential binding sites for D-ribose and Cl. Residues are coloured by sequence conservation between these three proteins.  
[[Image:2ob5_triple-set.jpg||Structural ]]
It is again clear that the structural alignment is good, even at the quaternary level. Additionally, it can be seen that although 2ob5 has many areas of low conservation, these generally correspond with variable loop regions, and that the key secondary-structural elements remain remarkably constant.

Revision as of 21:54, 15 June 2009

Go Back To Main Page


Structure of 2ob5

Initial structural analyses indicate that 2ob5A is a member of the RbsD/FucU protein superfamily, and is of the RbsD-like fold classification. It is a globular protein composed of five alpha-helixes arranged around six internal beta strands in the tri-layered a/b/a fold characteristic of RbsD-like proteins.

Structural

Early structural alignments (such as Dali) suppoorted this classification, returning ribose-transport proteins as high similarity hits. Of the structures found, the majority of high-significance (z > 15) matches were variations on two prokaryotic RbsD proteins, 3e7n (D-ribose high affinity transport system, S. Typhi) and 1ogD (high affinity ribose transporting protein, B. Subtillis). These two crystal structures are shown at right.

Structures of 1ogd (A) and 3e7n (B)

Crystallographic visualisation of these two proteins has revealed that the biological unit of each is a homo-decameric oligomer, which has a ring--like quaternary structure. The complete oligomer of 3e7n is shown at left. PQS analysis of both structures suggests that this decameric assembly is correct for each.

Structural

Note the ring-like structure of the oligomer, which contains distinct upper and lower pentameric sub-rings which are rotated slightly relative to each other, such that no more than three subunits coincide at any one junction.



Structural similarity between the monomers of both proteins and 2ob5A is high, despite sequence identity values of less than 20%. To confirm the high structural identity of the Dali results (z=17.9 and 16.9 for 3e7n-c and 1ogd-D, respectively), the proteins were aligned using MultiSeq for VMD and overlaid.

Structural alignment of 2ob5 (red/blue), 1ogd (green) and 3e7n (yellow-green)

From visual analysis the strength of the alignment is clear.

At left, 2ob5 is coloured by a BLOSUM60 plot of residue conservation. The prevalence of blue residues in the internal beta-sheets indicates high sequence conservation in those regions. This is supported by the molecule's RbsD-like fold classification, as the 6-strand beta-sheet structure is highly conserved in RbsD proteins.



Due to this considerable structural similarity, we conducted an in depth comparison of 2ob5A to the better characterised 3e7n and 1ogd.

The binding sites of 1ogd are known, and the protein has been crystallised bound to its ribose-D ligand in a pentameric ring quaternary structure. The oligomerisation of the protein appears necessary for the binding of this ligand, as the active site lies in a cleft between proteins adjacent on the same ring

Structural

, and includes coordinating residues from both subunits. A LIGPLOT analysis of the 1ogd ribose-D binding site is shown at left.

Structural

His20 is donated by the adjacent monomer. This residue arrangement is shown in 3D in at right.

Structural

Residues are again coloured by sequence conservation. All five residues are conserved in 3e7n, further supporting their involvement in binding of ribose-D. 2ob5A was not crystallised with ligand present. As such, it is uncertain whether it too is a ribose binding protein. His20, Tyr120 and Asp28 on 1ogd are all conserved in 2ob5A. Asn122 appears to have undergone a deletion judging from the sequence alignment, and His98 and Lys102 have been substituted for by Arg and Tyr residues, respectively. These differences may suggest a slightly different specificity. However, the 3D Multiseq alignment of 2ob5 with 1ogD and 3e7n retained the binding amino acids in position. Superimposition of the 1ogD ligand onto an aligned 2ob5A suggests that the binding mode and/or ligand of 2ob5 is similar

Structural

. Visualisation of the corresponding surfaces indicate that a binding cleft is still present on 2ob5A.

Structural

In addition, CASTp analysis predicts the monomer's highest surface-area cleft at this site.

Structural

A large pocket is identified by CASTp in 1ogd atthe same site, although this protein's pentameric crystallisation allows its predicted cleft to include the adjacent His20 residue.


1ogd was cocrystallised with an ion, tentatively labelled as a chloride in this case. The ion coordinating site lies at the amino-terminus of the protein. Ligplot analysis gives Lys2 as a key residue for ion coordination.

Structural

Figure X

shows the 3D alignment of two 1ogD pentamers onto the 3e7n decameric scaffold. The chloride ion is visible in the centre of the facing side. Bound Ribose-D molecules are also visible. From this, it is suggested that ions are coordinated by two adjacent monomers; specificlly by the residue Lys 2. Unlike the ribose binding site, however, the ion binding cleft is formed by subunits on different pentameric rings; one from the upper and one lower. The Lys2 residues combine with hydrophobic residues on each subunit's amini-terminal loop to form an ion cage structure.

Structural

This is clearly visible in the figure at left. Although the individual hydrophobic residues are poorly conserved, the cage structure and coordinating lysines are also present on 3e7n. It is possible that this ion contributes to the stability of the decameric ring, existing as it does at the interfaces between top and bottom halves of the oligomer.

When monomers of 2ob5 are superimposed on the ring structure of 1ogd or 3e7n, the target protein appears to retain its ion cage structure.

Structural

However, the critical coordinating lysine is not present. Lys2 has been replaced with a hydrophobic leucine residue (figure at right), which cannot coordinate a Cl ion. The only nearby positive residue - an arginine, which replaces Ala16 on 1ogd - appears in the wrong orientation, although this may be an artifact of the alignment. It is possible that 2ob5A does not have the ability to coordinate an ion at this site.

Surface representations of the 1ogD Cl-binding cleft indicate a buried coordination site. This corresponds to the predicted ion cage structure. The interface between the two subunits covers a comparatively large surface area at this site, and the region as a whole is comparatively well conserved. Of particular note is the residue Lys3, which is conserved across all three crystallised proteins and lies in an extended cleft in the adjacent monomer. This residue and its cleft is conserved in 2ob5, although individual sequence conservation at the cleft is not high.

2ob5 is shown here with the Cl ion present. As discussed, this may not be the case in situ.

This, along with a number of corresponding cleft-ligand-like features at the subunit interface of 2ob5, suggests that 2ob5 exists in the same decameric conformation as 1ogd and 3e7n despite the potential lack of ion coordination. Cast-P analysis supports this, as the molecule's second-largest predicted binding surface lies around the putative ion-coordinating region.

Structural

Finally, shown here are representations of a four-subunit face of each protein, demonstrating potential binding sites for D-ribose and Cl. Residues are coloured by sequence conservation between these three proteins. Structural It is again clear that the structural alignment is good, even at the quaternary level. Additionally, it can be seen that although 2ob5 has many areas of low conservation, these generally correspond with variable loop regions, and that the key secondary-structural elements remain remarkably constant.